top of page

Areas of Competency

Competency A: Demonstrate awareness of the ethics, values, and foundational principles of one of the information professions, and discuss the importance of those principles within that profession.

​

Statement of Competency
​

Introduction
The foundational principles that define and guide archival work are informed by professional standards. However, in practice, I have found ethical issues are rarely simple or clearly defined. Decision making calls for nuance and contextual sensitivity. The duty to provide access to information is often at odds with the duty to preserve and protect collections, or to honor the privacy of the donor, or to respect copyright law. Additionally, the illusory concept of archival neutrality has left gaps in the historical record, commonly referred to as archival silences, resulting from the absence or exclusion of records. When attending museum committee meetings to discuss potential accessions, I remind myself that history is fluid and rooted in perspective. The choice to accept or reject a collection from a donor carries weight in how researchers in the future will understand the past. Nevertheless, my understanding of professional standards has prepared me to exercise judgement and take responsibility for my choices, contributing to public trust in the profession at large. 

​

Provenance
First among archival values is the Principle of Provenance, which guides the organization of collection materials. Connecting to origins, provenance ensures that the contents and organization of a collection are maintained just as the originator of those materials, called the creator, kept and arranged them. Unlike libraries, contents of an archival collection are kept together even across diverse subjects and media. This is essential for the perseveration of context and validation of authenticity needed by researchers relying on primary source material. My first piece of evidence explores the tension between provenance and access when the archives is offered a donation which is a portion of a larger collection held at another institution. I discuss SAA’s standards of conduct, specifically professional relationships, judgement, and trust. My solution was to honor respect des fonds with open communication, including legal counsel, to create a collaborative digitization project, allowing the collection to be transferred to the other institution, while widening access to the users at both institutions.

​

Evidence #1 –  Exploring an Ethical Dilemma: Respect des Fonds 

​

Historical Research
My second piece of evidence is a discussion touching on human research subjects and the importance of conducting ethical historical research. I reference the American Historical Association’s “Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct” and the need for researchers to be aware of the often invisible labor and judgements of archivists, and how these impact the historical timeline, as well as issues of access overlapping with archival ethics. This gives evidence to the need for professional cooperation and honest communication between researchers and archivists in order to build trust and mutual respect.

​

Evidence #2 – A Discussion of History and Research Ethics

​

Privacy
My third piece of evidence takes a look at the intersection of ethics and protective regulations surrounding privacy for donors and creators. Archivists are frequently faced with the challenge of balancing access with privacy, but, as these collide with backlogs, diminished resources, and digital information, keeping that balance becomes complicated. Because of my background in medicine, I understand the need for discretion in identifying and protecting sensitive, personal information that may expose or harm living individuals. In this discussion piece I compare the regulations governing privacy across three different archival institutions: government, academic, and religious. Beyond the standards established by the profession, it is necessary to understand the state and federal laws surrounding access to collection records. I discuss FERPA which protects student privacy, HIPPA which protects patient privacy, FOIA which protects access to government records, and privacy laws protecting deceased minors and their parents.

​

Evidence #3 – Legal Regulations: Privacy versus Access

​

Conclusion
To keep current with evolving ethical standards, especially as they pertain to digital records and emerging technology, I know I will need to keep abreast of news and current events affecting the profession which are posted by the Committee on Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) and discussed within the applicable section forums on the SAA website. I will also need to keep informed of policy and procedural changes within my own institution and promote open dialogue with members of our local community.     

Next to Conclusion

HL

© 2026 by Heather Lloyd, all rights reserved

BlackbirdFlying Arts

bottom of page